Indoor selection checklist
- Ceiling and mounting
- Power, dimensions and cut-out
- Beam, output and glare
- CCT, CRI and controls
- Required files and delivery window
Resources / procurement evidence
Procurement Answers & Evidence Definitions
Use these on-page checklists to prepare a better RFQ and read evidence labels correctly. No download or certificate library is implied where a real file has not been published.
Pending confirmation
Capability or requirement is discussed at project level before any model, finish or document claim is published.
Four practical checklists
Prepare the inputs before comparing supply options.
These are live page references, not links to nonexistent documents.
Outdoor GCC checklist
- Application and site plan
- Ambient temperature
- Dust or coastal exposure
- Ingress, surge and voltage
- Optics, mounting and approvals
LED module RFQ checklist
- Dimensions
- Wattage
- CCT
- CRI
- Driver
- Thermal condition
- Quantity
Model evidence checklist
- Named model and version
- Responsible partner
- Document owner or issuer
- Covered scope and date
- Review status and missing fields
Evidence-state glossary
Labels describe different proof levels.
None of the three labels is an automatic certification, approval or whole-project claim.
Catalogue source
Product family and image are traceable to a supplier catalogue; project configuration still requires review.
Pending confirmation
Capability or requirement is discussed at project level before any model, finish or document claim is published.
Scope reviewed
A named application or file scope has been reviewed; model-level documents and project fit are confirmed per RFQ.
Document purpose map
Know what a file can and cannot support.
Always match the document to its owner, exact model or version, scope, date and current review status.
| Document | Primary use | Owner to identify |
|---|---|---|
| Datasheet | Published model and configuration fields | Partner or named product owner |
| Drawing | Dimensions, mounting and version definition | Partner or engineering owner |
| Photometric file | Optical calculation for the exact version | Named model data owner |
| Test report | Test method, sample and measured scope | Actual laboratory or issuing body |
| Certificate | Standard and product scope declared by the issuer | Actual issuer and certificate holder |
| Sample record | Reviewed model, configuration and finish version | Buyer, Topeng and partner by agreed scope |
| Packing record | Packing marks, quantities and release condition | Named order and logistics parties |
Document 1
Datasheet
- Primary use
- Published model and configuration fields
- Owner to identify
- Partner or named product owner
Document 2
Drawing
- Primary use
- Dimensions, mounting and version definition
- Owner to identify
- Partner or engineering owner
Document 3
Photometric file
- Primary use
- Optical calculation for the exact version
- Owner to identify
- Named model data owner
Document 4
Test report
- Primary use
- Test method, sample and measured scope
- Owner to identify
- Actual laboratory or issuing body
Document 5
Certificate
- Primary use
- Standard and product scope declared by the issuer
- Owner to identify
- Actual issuer and certificate holder
Document 6
Sample record
- Primary use
- Reviewed model, configuration and finish version
- Owner to identify
- Buyer, Topeng and partner by agreed scope
Document 7
Packing record
- Primary use
- Packing marks, quantities and release condition
- Owner to identify
- Named order and logistics parties
FAQ / evidence boundary
Evidence interpretation FAQ
These answers separate public evidence from the configuration and file checks completed for a live project.
What is the difference between Catalogue source and Scope reviewed?
Catalogue source traces a product family and published data. Scope reviewed refers to a named application or file scope, not automatic model approval.
How can a certificate be matched to a product?
Check the issuer, holder, standard, covered model and version, date and stated scope.
What happens when a field is missing?
It remains marked for project confirmation instead of being estimated or promoted as evidence.